Music Theory and U July 24, 2010, 12:25:00 PM

So this is the opener to another interesting thread that I would like to share on here.

From: Dracvs

Yesterday, I entered a debate in Spanish about the current state of the music, and I think I will open it here.

So the thing is, most stars that created the music we love and adore today are passing away. The main point of this debate is that here has been some time now (I say almost 10 years) without any of those revolutionizing bands that change the way of music forever.

Let me give you a couple examples so I can explain this much better:
Back in the day, The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, Pink Floyd made such big statements musically speaking, the created genres, they marked a generation, they made progress, became innovators and vanguard musicians. Each one left their footprint in this world.

Then, in the 90’s the last sparks of universal way of communicating with music came to an end. Korn relased Follow the Leader, and Linkin Park Hybrid Theory, which, had the common attribute to be liked by everyone. Same with Oasis and the What’s the Story (Morning Glory) album. Everybody loved Wonderwall and maybe the songs and albums are not that great, but they had that way of catering to everyone without caring their social, racial or musical taste. They were universal music.

Now a days, we don’t have that kind of movement. Those songs that are so well made everybody likes them are not made anymore. I don’t know if it’s the generation but I have so many theories about this.
Stars die and keep disappearing without any other stars to replace them. Before you would have one band like Linkin Park, and 10 or more were born in the same vein. Nowadays you have isolated success in rock, like for instance, you get one Album by In Flames (let’s go with the one example everybody knows) but it’s only for In Flames Fans or for rock people. The rest of the world could care less. Before this time, when Smells like teen spirit was released everybody liked it and it was public domain music was in a very different note.

Nowadays rock music lives in its own isolation just for the fans, without those shining stars making the world move. There has been very little of those in the past years.

I wonder what you think of this.

From: Starmountainkid

Currently and for the past 20 or 30 years there is no music. I grew up in the ’60’s and ’70’s, so I can say that. You see, music used to be produced by record company exectutives who loved the music and nurtured bands and artists. Those are bygone days. Now there are only about four international corporations that control almost all the music you hear. Their bottom line is profit, and therefore music quality and creativity is unimportant.

In any music genre all the bands or performers sound the same. I an artist does not sound like all the other artists in a particular genre, he’ll never get a recording contract. It’s as if today’s music is created by a music making machine, which it in essence is.

So, the future of music? As long as the Corporate Music Industry controls the music, there is no future for music.

From: Hyperion
Quote from: Stormountainkid

Currently and for the past 20 or 30 years there is no music. I grew up in the ’60’s and ’70’s, so I can say that. You see, music used to be produced by record company exectutives who loved the music and nurtured bands and artists. Those are bygone days. Now there are only about four international corporations that control almost all the music you hear. Their bottom line is profit, and therefore music quality and creativity is unimportant.

That sounds similar to the movie industry. I own the movie The Seven Samurai, which I mention because, in the special features disk, there was an interview with Akira Kurosawa, the Japanese film director who made said movie. During that interview, Mr. Kurosawa talked about his time as an assistant director for a growing company that nurtured and trained all recruits. Eventually, all the guys would go on to become directors, including Mr. Kurosawa.

Mr. Kurosawa, though, would go on to lament how times have changed: they no longer use that system any more. Instead, it’s about maximizing the profit margin. Furthermore, assistant directors having the kind of freedom there was during his time would be unthinkable. Now, they’re made to do whatever they’re told, and creativity is stifled.

From: Me

I would like to say that during their time, most of the mentioned musicians weren’t loved by the majority. They had their own cult followings. Their origins were the Blues which wasn’t accepted by the majority during their time either.

As for music being shit now? Maybe. But I disagree that it was shit after the 70’s. During the 90’s we had some new genre’s start up even if they were still largely an underground movement. Riot Grrrl is one example. Largely sociopolitical and took influences from Punk and Grunge. It was needed since a good deal of the hard hitting rock female bands dissolved or went soft, there was mostly that pop bullshit for girls.

But yeah, I digress. It’s not only in music where the influential ones are dieing. It happened in comedy too. George Carline and Bill Hicks, for example.

From: Dhampir Boy
Quote from: Starmountainkid

You see, music used to be produced by record company exectutives who loved the music and nurtured bands and artists. Those are bygone days. Now there are only about four international corporations that control almost all the music you hear. Their bottom line is profit, and therefore music quality and creativity is unimportant.

In any music genre all the bands or performers sound the same. I an artist does not sound like all the other artists in a particular genre, he’ll never get a recording contract. It’s as if today’s music is created by a music making machine, which it in essence is.

So, the future of music? As long as the Corporate Music Industry controls the music, there is no future for music.

What you wrote reminds me of this quote I came across:

Quote

“I’ve got this idea of starting a record company. I get so tired of listening to the way everyone treats music. I keep feeling they’re selling out. And I don’t like the way artists are treated either. Bing Crosby isn’t the only one who can make records. I don’t know, I think it would be fun.”

That was Johnny Mercer back in 1942 talking about starting what would become Capitol Records. Before World War II wrapped up, there were only three major record labels (Decca, RCA Victor, and Columbia). By the time the war was over, Capitol Records became the fourth. The Big Four have switched up over the years with EMI, Sony, Warner-Chapel, and Universal emerging as the victors. The industry has just been maintaining equilibrium within that power play. Until labels become financially infeasible, it is going to continue on this way.

Also, it would appear to me that the music business has always been about business. They have to be concerned about a sustainable business model, and promoting music that doesn’t have a market is a rather poor way of meeting that basic and essential goal. A business doesn’t do anyone any good when it goes bankrupt.

With that in mind, however, there is a lot of crazy and interesting music out there, it just tends to get released on labels started up by the artists themselves.

From: Dracvs

You know, when you mentioned that, I went down and tried to remember where I read it, and today I found the DVD

Dream Theater DVD Score, a commercial success capable of kicking out of the charts some other popsie someone and staying at first place for I don’t remember how many weeks. Is one of those gems that manage to overcome the whole “is not commercial it doesn’t sell” and the “if it’s good, then it’s in a band created label” label.

Then you have story repeating itself in The Dark Side of the Moon one of the most acclaimed albums of our history. With Abbey Road…

Now, the state of the actual music as a whole, is has never been more of a show than before.

In the 60’s, the beatles, stormed the world. They sent it head over feet.

Black sabbath and led zeppelin created Heavy music. We love and loathe today.

but in the 2000, specially in this decade that starts this year, it has been: “who can make the biggest ridicule in TV and live to tell the tale”

We get Kanye West pissing with stupidity over someone actually talented (Taylor Swift), We get Lady Gaga’s Shenanigans and aluminum cans in her hair, with get Pink’s irreverence and disrespect, we get sex tapes from many places, Drug problems that are just terrible (Lindsay Lohan, Amy “BeeHive Head” Winehouse, Brittney Spears), we get stupid teens trying to become mature sex symbols (Miley Cyrus) we get androgynous… dudes (Tokio Hotel, justin bieber) and then we get empty music with nothing but chaka chaka in the rythm just to play on discoteques and bars (almost everything MTV these days)

But somehow, there are so many small stars shining out that I still have hope, so many musicians trying to make an actual difference in the world.

Take for instance muse, a no name band, that with a very strange music has taken the world by storm. So many other good bands that are just genius are getting radio time. I guess finally the world is changing once again, people probably will still love their Celebrity Realities Soap Operas of the real life, because what better than to mock others misfortune?

But there is something very important:

Very few good musicians get to the World Spotlight. And even few, manage to make a stand for what they believe.

I wish, you guys spoke spanish, because Juanes, the Colombian composer and guitarist / singer has quite the message for everyone. In a country ravaged by the guerrilla, in tatters with one of the biggest mortality rates, he still goes around the whole trying to get everyone to stop fighting. Now that’s something not everyone does. I will try and translate my favorite songs so you know what they say. and post them somehow so you can listen to them. Probably is not your style but it’s worth trying it out.

I guess people from this side of the pond think different because of the different circumstances we live in.

During the World Cup opening the Black Eyed Peas went on stage. And they, of course, were stupid, dull and without a message. Unlike the rest of the african singers and most of the latin ones. They are not even musicians!!

Now Alicia Keys has the voice, she is sucesful so….

Man I don’t know. The balance is never alright, there is always someone somewhere that is such a prodigy of the music that no matter where they stand, the label, anything. They are sure to be a success. I guess music works this way and there is no way to say this will be or will not be

I still think the music of this decade sucks and it’s horrible to no end.

From: Me

Alicia Keys is crap too. Again, you’re listening to mainstream shit with poppy stereotypical lyrics. What? You don’t think stereotypical bullshit lyric writing existed back in the day? Seriously?

Look at fucking glam and hair bands. They did it all just to get laid meaning that they only learned to play enough to be able to get women. Sadly, that doesn’t require much. Most of the stereotypical “greats” that people swoon over were great because most people don’t know to play instruments or sing on key.

From: Dracvs

Hair metal is a horrible thing that happened in the 80s and vaccined the music industry so things like Metallica could master the thrash and make it the default angry sound of the world (in a way…)

Yes, maybe alicia keys is crappy popsie, but she has an incredible voice with such a range go to waste. Still the overwhelming amount of shit we get is big enough to block the little gems of real music

Take for instance Elbow. Now That’s a really slow band that comes from the UK they are amazing, are great musicians and the lyrics are magical.

But.. coldplay gets the radio time (and their songs and music is mediocre at best, a vulgar copy of Oasis with radiohead whom are a vulgar copy of the beatles and…. well radiohead is weird I don’t understand them)

Then you have dredg another band with amazing lyrics and even better musicians, and who gets the spotlight? COLDPLAY! … sometimes I think the world is unfair in the music business. It’s a business after all.

From: Dhampir Boy

I don’t know about Alicia Keys. Her debut album was called “Songs in A Minor”, which just sounds damned lazy.

From: Me

Raidohead is a great band. Metallica, I’ve come to realize, is the pop of Thrash. Ac/DC is the pop of Heavy Metal.

Either way, Metallica had a good influence on Thrash, but many other bands contributed to it as well. I’ve come to realize that most of a genre’s sound is usually created from multiple sources during a certain time period.

Alicia Key’s voice is not that great. I’ve heard classmates sing that have the same voice range. Christina Aguilera’s voice is the one that is put to waste the most.

Either way, like I’ve been saying. Don’t look at the mainstream shit that is thrown at you. Every generation has had it’s fair share of bullshit mainstream hurled at them. It’s your choice whether to ignore it or not.

From: Dracvs

But that is not the point Sarah, the thing is:

I ignore it all. Imagine the the first time I head poker face was by Cartman in South Park. And I didn’t know what the hell was it all about!

So basically, what I am trying to say is:

In comparison with years past, the quantity (And their quality) of actual musicians that are worth a dime, is diminishing every single year. Whether they make it to the mainstream or not.

BUT, I saw something this weekend that I wanted to say here in this one topic:

Do you know who is the one leading the world charts? Is no longer MTV, is Rockband and Guitar Hero

These two games have had such a great impact in how people of young age perceive music! now you see them going broad listening to things they shouldn’t care because of their age, but somehow playing a song (even tho is plastic 4 button fake guitars and drums) connects you to the music somehow.

I mean, my Godson, it’s only 14. And he told me this weekend if I had anything King Crimson. Of course my surprise was such I almost fell from my chair. I was like

“King.. Crimson? Are you on drugs? If You are we are going to have such a fucking problem Kid” And he told me:

“No no! i heard them in Rock Band and liked it! : D ” Yes he smiles that big

Even tho he still believes he is some kind of rapper, and what not, his mind is wrapping around the concept of progressivism, and whatever lyrics he raps, has… has actual meaning! Also he got some Opeth from the same source and I am just maybe going crazy here, but I think these two games had have disbalanced our Music Society.

From: Me

I know what your point is Drac-man. I just don’t agree with it. It only seems that way to you because we tend to appreciate artists more when they are dead or when their time has already passed. The become the hype and people are always rediscovering and being inspired by the past so the trend continues.

From: Dracvs

Yeah I suppose that’s true. Influences keep being drawn from the Beatles (to me, the best band ever to grace the earth) But then again from the great masters. I wonder what will music will be in 10 years when things are not so broken (or are broken beyond repair)

From: Me

People would probably have forgotten about the Beatles and the like by then. Kids these days already refer to the 90’s music as old stuff and think music then had more meaning than today’s stuff. Ironic, no?

From: Howard

The way I see it is that music is purely subjective, always has been and always will be. I try never to knock anyone’s musical taste, just because I’m don’t like a particular genre.

As one grows older, ones taste in music tends to change or broaden somewhat. I remember the music my parents used to like and as a teenager I absolutely hated the stuff. All I was interested in was Black Sabbath and Deep Purple etc. Now I can appreciate some of the stuff my parents used to listen to as my musical horizons have broadened.

What we see as rubbish now, may well go on to be regarded as classic in years to come.

I seem to remember Black Sabbath and Deep Purple were once regarded as just guitar clanking noise by all but the youth at the time, only now do we realise that actually they were and are very talented indeed.

Music doesn’t have to be complicated, nor does it require virtuoso performances on an instrumental or vocal level. All it requires is the ears of those that enjoy it.

From: Dracvs

Howard, I don’t think we can remember Simple Plan and Lady gaga as transcendental music….. hahaha

Maybe some metal act will live forever as metal never dies and the rest of the things keep dying and reviving.

From: Wooldridge
Quote from: Dracvs

Howard, I don’t think we can remember Simple Plan and Lady gaga as transcendental music….. hahaha

Maybe some metal act will live forever as metal never dies and the rest of the things keep dying and reviving.

Before I actually shove my full opinion into this thread:

Simple Plan is crap. I won’t argue that one. Lady Gaga isn’t really transcendental music, but at the same time people tend to just listen to something like “Poker Face” and immediately disregard everything she does immediately after that. I’m not saying she doesn’t produce commercial pop that serves to feed her own musical identity (all of the stuff she writes is very self-indulgent.)

What I’m saying here is that Lady Gaga is significantly better than Simple Plan, and can actually sing. Something that seems to be disregarded by people when just bashing her for bringing nothing new to the table and yet not realizing that the number of new things brought to the table has stagnated in terms of modern music for the past several years.

There is a song of Lady Gaga’s called “Speechless” that made me realize, in a live performance, that she can actually sing, and that she is, while generic, bringing an interesting perspective to the table. A great majority of Gaga’s music can have the electronic pop crap replaced with something of an old jazz sound, and it works wonderfully.

This was made infinitely accurate in my eyes when I heard her perform, on “Today”, “Someone To Watch Over Me”.

That all being said, I think “LoveGame” is one of the worst songs I’ve ever heard, and she’s really trying too hard to work the whole “lol I’m eccentric” angle.

From: Wooldridge

Alright, lengthy opinion post. I like music. Anyone who pays attention to when I seriously post YouTube videos, or mention the things I like (Or checks out my Last.FM page) sees that I listen to music from just about everything short of modern country and contemporary christian music. My iTunes playlist has video game soundtracks, opera, broadway plays, metal, alternative, rap, jazz, blues, and so on. I will listen to whatever I can, if it appeals to me.

I’m not of the idea that there is one set decade where music was at its finest. I don’t think it really gives credit to bands that emerge from later decades and so on. However, I have to agree that there seems to be a decidedly… less welcoming sound, so to speak, regarding the modern music market. I’ve actually stopped actively seeking new (chronologically) music instead going to share-threads and similar things just to experience new (unfamiliar) music regardless of the time period.

Because it would make this post even longer than it really is, I can’t properly just quote the pieces I’m responding to and do the typical “bit-by-bit” post that tends to be done here, so instead I’m going to just half-generalize the things I’ve read while attempt to be as respectful to everyone’s already declared statements. There may end up being some redundancy, and for that I apologize, but people sometimes share opinions on matters. Ultimately, I’m probably going to add nothing new to the topic, but I wanted to post.

Popular bands have always been in it for money. I remember seeing an interview with Kid Rock (when he was still relevant to some degree) saying, (paraphrased) “Well, yes, we are all in it for the music. If you didn’t love making music, you’d do something else. But we’re also in this for the money, because this is good money.” Bands like The Beatles, before they found drugs and made better music, only really crapped out generic love songs to girls that screamed and peed themselves. There are bands that do things for the sake of revolutionizing the music industry, but at the same time, there are barriers they have to maintain if they want mainstream success and an attempt to have this as a career.

The most important thing with a band, or a singer, regardless of unique the sound is, is to feel connected to them on some level. The Beatles, Pink Floyd, Zeppelin (even though I don’t really like them), Sabbath, and so on, connected with the audience on levels that a lot of bands are still desperately trying to reach. It’s almost certainly part of why some bands are always wanting to be considered “the new Beatles”.

But it’s always been commercialized, even in the old times, when people now think music back then was somehow more “pure”– to use that euphemistically– in terms of commercialism. But people who think that tend to completely disregard something like Motown. The entire concept of Motown is “get as many singles out as you possible can.” “Hitsville, USA”. If you look at a Motown library of music, you’ll see that there are at least three copies of the same song performed by different people, and even among the same groups, there are alternative takes of a song. “Ain’t No Mountain High” was performed at least three different times. That Marvin Gaye’s performance of it was one of the most memorable is just a sign that Marvin, though being part of the commercialism that is Motown, can find a way to connect with the audience.

But as mentioned by [Me], bands weren’t always given the recognition they “deserved” until after their deaths. Both in terms of the death of the members of the band, or the simple act of dissolving it. These things happen.

Punk, grunge, and the other more vaguely rebellious and angry genres of the 80s and 90s decidedly help my point. Punk is, at its best, social awareness that brings people together on that light. People who listen to it feel the music through them, and they feel the words. If they can make it out sometimes. They could be listening to The Clash, or anything, and they’re going to feel what is being said. Or they’re listening to Alice in Chains, or Perl Jam, or Nirvana, and feeling that this music is reaching out to them in a way that nothing else has before.

Quote from: Dracvs

We get Kanye West pissing with stupidity over someone actually talented (Taylor Swift), We get Lady Gaga’s Shenanigans and aluminum cans in her hair, with get Pink’s irreverence and disrespect, we get sex tapes from many places, Drug problems that are just terrible (Lindsay Lohan, Amy “BeeHive Head” Winehouse, Brittney Spears), we get stupid teens trying to become mature sex symbols (Miley Cyrus) we get androgynous… dudes (Tokio Hotel, justin bieber) and then we get empty music with nothing but chaka chaka in the rythm just to play on discoteques and bars (almost everything MTV these days)
Taylor Swift’s music, that I’ve heard, has just come across to me as “I’m a teenager and life is hard ” on a number of levels. Kayne is a half-decent rapper, but someone like MF DOOM– or to be more mainstream, Lupe Fiasco (or, hell, Eminem)– is significantly more talented.

Gaga I’ve already touched on, and Pink is pop music. Miley, though I refuse to listen to her music because what I’ve heard sucks, I think is attempt to maintain relevance as her old career slowly becomes obsolete. She started as a child, and if she wants to maintain relevance as an ‘artist’ (using that term loosely to indicate ‘someone who is involved in the industry’) then she has to shift her appearance and other things. She can’t maintain the innocent 13 year old girl act forever.

Christina Aguilera did the same thing whenever one of her albums came out. She shifted from being all pure and teen, to basically dressing as ridiculously as she could before she went to the “Back to Basics” album and dressed like she was Monroe.

Comparably, though, Christina can actually sing, and is absurdly talented vocally.

Alicia Keys I don’t think is too bad. She doesn’t really bring anything, and I feel nothing when I listen to the music, but I like vaguely soul piano sounds.

Hair Metal, as I’ve said before, is probably one of the worst things to happen to rock music short of the over-genre-fication recently.

Quote from: Dracvs

But.. coldplay gets the radio time (and their songs and music is mediocre at best, a vulgar copy of Oasis with radiohead whom are a vulgar copy of the beatles and…. well radiohead is weird I don’t understand them)

Then you have dredg another band with amazing lyrics and even better musicians, and who gets the spotlight? COLDPLAY! … sometimes I think the world is unfair in the music business. It’s a business after all.

Coldplay is actually a bunch of plagiarists, but at the same time their Radiohead-Lite sound is something that works if I’m not really wanting to listen to Jonny Greenwood throw a radio down a flight of stairs and make computer noises while Thom sings a bunch of nonsense sentences about a dog and a fish or whatever.

That said, Radiohead is one of my favorite bands, and even if they are absurdly pretentious, I could listen to them forever.

Dredg is also really good, but I never really listen to them because I keep forgetting they exist.

Most bands, in time, will be forgotten. What keeps a lot of these people going is the knowledge that, if they leave a good memory– a good collection of music– it will remain timeless. No band wants to be obscured by time, until they’re performing at casinos for $5 a ticket as they try to get their last attempt at relevance to the airwaves. Pop Punk, as a genre, is something that I feel cannot maintain relevance.

Lady Gaga will not maintain relevance. If she tries, she’ll end up like Madonna, and not in a good way, since I don’t like Madonna.

Even, eventually, bands like The Beatles may not feel relevant anymore. A few more generation and people may think a song like “Eleanor Rigby” means as much as “My Baby Takes The Morning Train” or “Don’t You Want Me?”– songs that have become commercials, or just a reminder of how music was, but what connection people had is lost.

Pink Floyd and Bob Marley will probably hang around longer, until people stop doing drugs. (herp)

But as I said in the beginning, music is, at it’s absolute best, giving the audience something to connect to during the performance. Either the lyrics, or the music. Or the combination.

“Pyramid Song”, by Radiohead, is one of my favorites of theirs. The music starts off with nothing by Thom on a piano, but it hits me in a way that leaves me feeling utterly insignificant in the scheme of the universe. Tom Waits has some of the best lyrics I’ve heard. Nine Inch Nails, though lacking in subtlety sometimes, finds a way to conjure up fantastic concepts and stories through the whole of the album.

From: Me
Though I agree with your statement in regards to most of what you said, I still don’t agree on some key points.

You still seem to think that “artists” aren’t connected with their audiences as they used to be. That’s not true.

It really has to do with what touches or affects each generation personally. Genre not withstanding, those from older generations have a hard time relation with newer stuff. Always been that way. We’re just getting old is all.

“However, I have to agree that there seems to be a decidedly… less welcoming sound, so to speak, regarding the modern music market.”

As have been said before, it’s because we’re not looking. People just expect the good stuff to magically appear to them. That’s not how it is and it’s never how it ever was. Never mind the fact that what’s good varies from person to person.

As for Gaga, no need to even look at the performance, you can look up some performances by her on youtube under real name. She can play the piano quite well. She never got recognition that way though. People bitch about her not being talented based on what is popular and fail to realize that that’s the only reason that she IS popular.

You don’t get famous for being talented. You get famous for catering to what people want or expect.

From: Wooldridge

Welcome to “I don’t even remember what I wrote.”

Quote from: [Me]

Though I agree with your statement in regards to most of what you said, I still don’t agree on some key points.

You still seem to think that “artists” aren’t connected with their audiences as they used to be. That’s not true.

It really has to do with what touches or affects each generation personally. Genre not withstanding, those from older generations have a hard time relation with newer stuff. Always been that way. We’re just getting old is all.

Well, while I agree, I also think it bears mentioning that I have difficulty with some of the newer things by one of my favorite bands. Like I mentioned of Korn in the Metal topic, the same holds true for The Cure. I said before that their more recent album “4:13 Dream”, is depressingly shallow. Mudvayne, Korn, and other bands have the same issue.

I am getting older, and my tastes are shifting. Five years ago I wouldn’t even listen to blues, or consider rap.

Basically I’m whining that I don’t feel connected. And that bugs me because music is sometimes the closest thing to a spiritual event that I have short of getting a good story going. I have the music I like, and that I listen to, but when even bands I used to adore just make me go “Really?” I feel like I’ve lost part of myself and I don’t really know how to react.

Quote from: [Me]

Wooldridge: “However, I have to agree that there seems to be a decidedly… less welcoming sound, so to speak, regarding the modern music market.”

As have been said before, it’s because we’re not looking. People just expect the good stuff to magically appear to them. That’s not how it is and it’s never how it ever was. Never mind the fact that what’s good varies from person to person.

I get almost all of my music from recommendations from other people. So I kind of do have the good stuff magically appear me. It’s how I found bands like Man Man, Jack of Jill, or Tom Waits. I know that things actually exist and I just have to find it, but “finding” it for me consists of going to /mu/’s archives, or Pandora, and seeing what they tell me to listen to. Otherwise I just hang out on my iTunes and look for songs I haven’t heard often enough.

Quote from:[Me]

As for Gaga, no need to even look at the performance, you can look up some performances by her on youtube under real name. She can play the piano quite well. She never got recognition that way though. People bitch about her not being talented based on what is popular and fail to realize that that’s the only reason that she IS popular.

You don’t get famous for being talented. You get famous for catering to what people want or expect.

Any performance of her with a piano, even if it’s a standard single from her album, is pretty great and fits the general jazzy feel that I mentioned in the first of my entirely too lengthy posts. Gaga knows exactly what she’s doing in terms of getting famous, holding onto it, and becoming absurdly rich in the process. That she writes the stuff herself is something that I hold highly, even if I don’t like all of the music.

From: Me
Quote from: Wooldridge

“Basically I’m whining that I don’t feel connected. And that bugs me because music is sometimes the closest thing to a spiritual event that I have short of getting a good story going. I have the music I like, and that I listen to, but when even bands I used to adore just make me go “Really?” I feel like I’ve lost part of myself and I don’t really know how to react.”

Ah. I took it as a general statement. I tend to feel the same way about any band that I’ve followed for a long time as well. But a lot of the bands that I truly care for are no longer together. Music connects me to people and makes me feel closer to them…as does art. It’s one of my main connections to the outside world.How you find music is different how I have found it. Like I said, music is my bond with other people. Jack Off Jill came to me when I was 17 and I was in my second year of college. I used to spend as much time out of the house as possible and befriended during the same time a girl in the neighborhood. Apparently, we met before when we were both six years old in Queens, New York. Her father did some construction work at my house there. Either way, as part of my desire to not face home life, I skipped classes and took long rides with her in her car. The soundtrack that she played a lot was Jack Off Jill’s latets album and the song that grabbed me was Vivica…so much so that I would skip all the other tracks to listen to it. It became our song and it’s the song that I associate with her.The point of the story is that that is how music is for me. After that connection is established I usually end up looking for all the musician’s works. Then I look at all their connections in the music world (either via collaborations or genre similarities)…and that cycle continues until I hit a dead end or a musician that I am not fond of after hearing their stuff.As for Gaga, I have not listened to all her latest things because I dislike Pop for the most part. I will take your word on it though. The fact that she writes her own lyrics is indeed admirable for one in the pop business. I’m not too surprised though. She’s a smart woman if nothing else.P.S. I have last.fm and Pandora as well so I’ll check out yours out of interest.

From: Dhampir Boy
Quote from: Wooldridge

Well, while I agree, I also think it bears mentioning that I have difficulty with some of the newer things by one of my favorite bands. Like I mentioned of Korn in the Metal topic, the same holds true for The Cure. I said before that their more recent album “4:13 Dream”, is depressingly shallow. Mudvayne, Korn, and other bands have the same issue.

Which would be artists struggling to maintain a presence as contemporaries. Most artists simply cannot manage, especially in the mainstream. David Bowie was one of the few mainstream artists who could anticipate the trends and adapt well to them. Tom Waits remains relevant, and even popular, yet still isn’t mainstream (probably because he won’t let his music play on commercials). Most artists, however, try to hold onto a seat on the bandwagon and appease the fickle, attention-deficit masses only to end up with something superficial and disastrously contrived. Like Mudvayne. Only some flourish over time. Most fall into a scale somewhere between fading away into mediocrity and losing touch with reality altogether.

From: Dracvs

@Woolridge and @[Me] : I use both your methods to find new music and one more, I go to the main record labels (RoadRunner, Epic, Interscope, EMI and so forth (metal blade, soundscape and most of small european raw metal labels) and check the latest releases every so often. That way I can keep check on what’s new, undiscovered or just in plain sight. It’s not easy because you have to go through a lot of shit. Also BlabberMouth who keep track of almost all metal releases in the planet.

As for the part to stay relevant, let’s go back to the 70’s and 60’s

People say they both were the best times, is because the quantity of the bands that were born there, and created trends and rhythms is higher than in any other time except for the baroque and classical times of course.

Pink Floyd, Queen, for instance, were famous during their times not after they disbanded. heck! the dark side of the moon was not commercial and I think is one of the most successful albums ever. The dark side of the moon is dark (obviously) heavy, depressing but is also genius and it’s just amazing. And it managed to be revolutionary and top of the charts. Same with queen. yet this bands were not famous for their albums but for their Theatrics, for the scenery, for the connection with the crowd while live. Specially Freddy Mercury. that guy was the front man.

led zeppelin is one of the most raw metals that exist, and they played a lot of blues actually. Much more than metal. I saw the other day the song remains the same in blu ray and seriously, the power they sweat on-stage….. it’s incredible.

There is one other factor. Back then there was no internet, no memes, no youtube, no nothing. You had a neighbor and a tape. or a Vinyl long play in mono. And friends. The radio actually had to play some tunes. today, we have the internet and a whole bunch of bands that make no sense (most indies. they are just there. and most of pop that’s just crap anyways with the exception that exists only in Japan just to put an example)

Then again everything is subjective and music is there.

Down here in the south we have a curse, an Egyptian plague of biblical proportions and epic magnitude, it is called:

Regueton

And it’s leaving brain dead teens and adults left and right in latin america. They have the same musical beat track for every song for the past 14 – 18 years, the same lyrics (life is hard in the slums I am the king of the street, im a thug, I kill the other reguetoneros blah blah blah) also is slowly crawling to America (thing that seriously terrifies me to no end) and the worse part is, people doesn’t care about anything else but that noise!

@all of you guys:
Sometimes, I wonder, how there are bands that keep reinventing themselves and being successful and others that try and fail in such horrible way.

Take for instance Metallica. Is an old band, with an old dying genre, and still, they get to fill Stadiums and sold outs every where they go in the whole planet. How do 4 50-something men do that with such noiseful music? well for one they are the biggest most energetic act on the face of earth as of 2010. james hettfield is the frontman. And now that they returned to play the classics mixed with the new songs? hah and the sound. BROTHER THE SOUND!! the sound that comes from every speaker is perfect. I don’t know how the hell they do it but it sounds so good live in a stadium that is almost a trick to the mind but you know its live. like an animal.

yet you have korn trying to “go back to roots” i heard one song and… well not too happy about it.

You have Dream Theater churning amazing album after amazing album and giving everything on stage.

Green day did the flight of the phoenix, they were kinda forgotten and made themselves relevant again to the point that they got a rock band game with american idiot.

Same with red hot chilli peppers and their stadium arcadium (quite the amazing album by the way).

I agree, music is all about the age, the time, and situation in which it is created. and I think that’s the most beautiful thing about it.

But I don’t agree with Saturn in the thing that the music is not there and you have to go the extra mile to find it in the hidden rat holes. There are bands that are so good, they go up and get radio time (like Muse, is the most fresh example I have) and muse is anything but commercial. specially their last album is….. strange. really.

And yes! it magically appears to you hahaha. let me explain

I have seen people playing one video game, and then changing their music habit just because a couple of songs (most of what Code Masters do have unknown artists, same with some of the EA Studios).

So it has some ways to get to you. Of course, you always have to go and find more, but that doesn’t mean you can get a good start just looking around you and not seeing the commercial stuff. Remember: Internet, radio, tv, sattelite, commercials we have an invasion in all senses.

Still. Music is in a deplorable state in 2010, and I don’t see it picking up for the time being. Also a lot of people is using the autotune, doing their tracks digitally, and … well. There is a lot of talent wasted every where in the planet.

From: Wooldridge
Quote from: Dhampir Boy

Which would be artists struggling to maintain a presence as contemporaries. Most artists simply cannot manage, especially in the mainstream. David Bowie was one of the few mainstream artists who could anticipate the trends and adapt well to them. Tom Waits remains relevant, and even popular, yet still isn’t mainstream (probably because he won’t let his music play on commercials). Most artists, however, try to hold onto a seat on the bandwagon and appease the fickle, attention-deficit masses only to end up with something superficial and disastrously contrived. Like Mudvayne. Only some flourish over time. Most fall into a scale somewhere between fading away into mediocrity and losing touch with reality altogether.

It’s the desperation to maintain relevance well after they’ve reached their prime that bothers me. Sometimes a band can properly shift how they appear, and maintain a level of relevance. The Goo-Goo dolls have slowly during into generic romance-pop music since “A Boy Named Goo”, but at the same time, their attempts to present themselves like that have also worked in their favor for the most part– I think “Dizzy Up The Girl” is significantly deeper than “Gutterflowers”, and exponentially better than “Let Love In”, but they are all immediately more accessible.– However, bands like The Cure, Mudvayne, and others, have distinctions about them than, when removed, make the band just not work properly in that pseudo-connection thing I mentioned.

Depeche Mode, contradicting the idea, had one of their best albums ever with “Playing The Angel” back in 2005 or so. And then you have Bowie, Waits, and Reznor, who seem to more or less be doing their own thing and don’t seem to particularly care. Bowie more in a kind of musical futurist way than Waits and Reznor. Waits clearly is doing his own thing, and Reznor, like Gaga, I think, goes into music with an idea of what he wants to do, and will set out to achieve that no matter really what gets in his way.

It’s just disheartening to me, really, to see a band I’ve grown up with (In this instance, The Cure) struggle so desperately to maintain some sense of relevance whenever the their last two albums just kind of are lackluster compared to the previous album (“Bloodflowers”).

Mudvayne, as someone who now appreciates music infinitely more than I did whenever they first came out, upsets me on a few levels. “LD 50” was a fantastic album. And “Lost and Found” just sounds so empty.

Quote from: [Me]

Ah. I took it as a general statement. I tend to feel the same way about any band that I’ve followed for a long time as well. But a lot of the bands that I truly care for are no longer together. Music connects me to people and makes me feel closer to them…as does art. It’s one of my main connections to the outside world.

Music, for me, just connects me to everything. Sometimes intimately, sometimes not. Feeling a band fall apart, musically, as I more or less said in response to D-Man is incredibly disheartening and whenever “4:13 Dream” came out, I couldn’t listen to The Cure after that for a bit. It just disappointed me so utterly. I didn’t feel betrayed or anything, but just with the feeling that “This is the best you can do?”

Music actually helped form some pretty interesting friendships with me in high school. Even though my own tastes have shifted more from theirs, artists (such as MF DOOM) are helping new friendships.

Quote from: [Me]

How you find music is different how I have found it. Like I said, music is my bond with other people. Jack Off Jill came to me when I was 17 and I was in my second year of college. I used to spend as much time out of the house as possible and befriended during the same time a girl in the neighborhood. Apparently, we met before when we were both six years old in Queens, New York. Her father did some construction work at my house there. Either way, as part of my desire to not face home life, I skipped classes and took long rides with her in her car. The soundtrack that she played a lot was Jack Off Jill’s latets album and the song that grabbed me was Vivica…so much so that I would skip all the other tracks to listen to it. It became our song and it’s the song that I associate with her.

To analogue: Whenever Mudvayne first showed up with “LD 50” I didn’t really care for it. The screaming, and everything else, just struck me as harsh. However, my junior and senior years, I spent a lot of time with a friend of mine who loved Mudvayne, and other instances of hard angry music– I was, at this time, absorbed in New Wave, Post-Punk, etc. Rarely did I listen to anything outside of the 80s– however it quickly grew on me and I started asking my friend for similar music.

I actually really got into a bunch of bands and artists through my friends during that time.
Radiohead, Squarepusher, Aphex Twin, Tom Waits, Mudvayne, Every Time I Die, 36 Crazyfists, As I Lay Dying, Mindless Self Indulgence, Air, Boards of Canada, Brad Melhdau, Bowie, Deftones, Meshuggah (They had wished, endlessly, that I listen to “Catch 33”), Mr. Bungle, Neuorsis, The Postal Service, Rage Against the Machine, Team Sleep. All of these people were groups I hadn’t really been familiar with, and more or less told to listen to because I’d love them. I have memories of my friends with some of these songs. Radiohead was my friend Drew’s favorite band for a while. Mudvayne my friend Bo’s.

“I Been Gone A Long Time” by Every Time I Die will always be cemented in my memories with Bo giving me a ride home from school, cackling ridiculously at the lyrics.

I grew up, quite simple, with groups like R.E.M., Nine Inch Nails, and The Cure. My mom is a fan of the three, and so I was exposed to them a lot. She also like the alt/grunge movement from Seattle, so I knew Pearl Jam, and the like.

My girlfriend got me into people like Flogging Molly, Dropkick Murphys, Placebo, Rise Against, Rancid, The Clash, and so on.

From there it kind of ranges. Some bands I found while looking at threads on places where they describe it in ways that sound interesting– Man Man, World’s End Girlfriend, and others– while people like Natalie Merchant, Amanda Palmer/The Dresden Dolls, Tech N9ne, DOOM and his aliases, were recommended to me by other friends.

Other times I just stumble onto it– like with Billie Holiday and the other people in Fallout 3. And part of me has always been a sucker for opera.

Quote from: [Me]

The point of the story is that that is how music is for me. After that connection is established I usually end up looking for all the musician’s works. Then I look at all their connections in the music world (either via collaborations or genre similarities)…and that cycle continues until I hit a dead end or a musician that I am not fond of after hearing their stuff.

As for Gaga, I have not listened to all her latest things because I dislike Pop for the most part. I will take your word on it though. The fact that she writes her own lyrics is indeed admirable for one in the pop business. I’m not too surprised though. She’s a smart woman if nothing else.

P.S. I have last.fm and Pandora as well so I’ll check out yours out of interest.

The bands I usually find in sharing threads, I usually end up looking for music that is similar in nature to stuff I’m familiar with unless I’m feeling experimental. Like when I looked at the “slowcore” and “shoe gaze” genres only to find I can’t stand most of the stuff I listened to. But at the same time I do look forward to finding new music, and it sounding like something I can’t immediately determine.

Tom Waits will probably always stay one of my favorites because it’s incredibly difficult to find things that sound like his newer pieces. Man Man comes close, but they’re too energetic, and don’t have the same hard-living sound of his things.

last.fm suggests we have a very high musical compatibility.

From: Dhampir Boy
Quote from: Dracvs

As for the part to stay relevant, let’s go back to the 70’s and 60’s

[…]

Pink Floyd, Queen, for instance, were famous during their times not after they disbanded. heck! the dark side of the moon was not commercial and I think is one of the most successful albums ever. The dark side of the moon is dark (obviously) heavy, depressing but is also genius and it’s just amazing. And it managed to be revolutionary and top of the charts. Same with queen. yet this bands were not famous for their albums but for their Theatrics, for the scenery, for the connection with the crowd while live. Specially Freddy Mercury. that guy was the front man.

Dark Side of the Moon was very much commercial. Every band signed to a major label was geared to be a commercial success because of how expensive pushing a band was. Just going by the cost of a studio. Studios used to cost half a million dollars just to build. Tape was ridiculously expensive (even more so now). Then there were practices such as payola to ensure that signed artists would get a good amount of radio play. It is only now, in the digital age of recording, that someone can just start up a band, record, and promote themselves for just a couple thousand dollars. In fact, labels expect artists to pull this off on their own first before they can be signed.

Thus, Pink Floyd and Queen were highly commercial. They had to have that kind of promise to get signed. But that promise was in rock music — and, in Pink Floyd’s case, stoners. They still were not “pop”, especially not in the United States. They were not winning Grammy’s. The Grammy’s were going to disco and folk music in the 70s. So if you want to compare them to modern music, Lady Gaga wouldn’t be the apt comparison. Compare them to Muse, who have had a song holding up on the Billboard rock charts for the past 50 weeks, and peaking at number 2.

Quote from: Dracvs

today, we have the internet and a whole bunch of bands that make no sense

Quote from: Dracvs

Down here in the south we have a curse, an Egyptian plague of biblical proportions and epic magnitude, it is called:

Regueton

And it’s leaving brain dead teens and adults left and right in latin america. They have the same musical beat track for every song for the past 14 – 18 years, the same lyrics (life is hard in the slums I am the king of the street, im a thug, I kill the other reguetoneros blah blah blah) also is slowly crawling to America (thing that seriously terrifies me to no end) and the worse part is, people doesn’t care about anything else but that noise!

I know all about reggaeton. My sister loves it. She is a professional Latin ballroom dancer and loves hip hop, so reggaeton is the perfect merger for her. Then again, she feels like the only purpose of music is to have something to dance to.

Quote from: Dracvs

But I don’t agree with Saturn in the thing that the music is not there and you have to go the extra mile to find it in the hidden rat holes. There are bands that are so good, they go up and get radio time (like Muse, is the most fresh example I have) and muse is anything but commercial. specially their last album is….. strange. really.

Muse is highly commercial. They have two songs from their last album on the Billboard rock charts. [Me] is telling me she first heard of Muse from a music video of theirs playing on MTV. I say that Muse is like Coldplay: A ripoff of Radiohead. The difference is that Coldplay is trying to rip off the mellower Radiohead that wrote songs like “Street Spirit (Fade Out)” while Muse is ripping off the more energetic Radiohead that wrote “Just”. Despite the similarity, I cannot like Coldplay and can enjoy Muse. It is easier to rip off something energetic and not come out sounding like a pompous ass.

The kinds of things I find hidden in rat holes, by the way, would include Brujeria. I found out about them around five years ago. The only other person I have met who had heard of them is this Puerto Rican kid I know from the school I am going to now (and he doesn’t like them). There is no way I could have stumbled upon Brujeria by chance, or by having them introduced to me.

By the way, you said you find out about new bands by following the web sites for record labels. How did you not hear of Necrophagist? [Me] has been wondering. Don’t keep tabs on Relapse Records?